A court case in the US state of Arizona has set a remarkable precedent: An AI-generated representation of a victim was used to address the perpetrator. This unusual use of artificial intelligence in the courtroom raises questions about the future possibilities and ethical implications of this technology.
In November 2021, Chris Pelkey lost his life in a traffic dispute that ended in a shooting. More than three years later, during the trial against the perpetrator, Pelkey's sister and brother-in-law used an AI reconstruction to give him a voice. The AI version of Pelkey expressed words of forgiveness to the defendant and speculated about a possible friendship in another life.
The relatives fed the AI with video footage and photos of Pelkey to create the virtual representation. A photo that Pelkey had edited with an aging filter was also used to visualize what he might have looked like as he grew older. Although the words were written by his relatives, acquaintances reportedly confirmed that the AI version accurately reflected Pelkey's personality.
The process of creating this AI representation was elaborate and complex, according to Pelkey's sister. She described the result as a "Frankenstein of love." Exactly which software and tools were used has not yet been publicly disclosed.
The judge was impressed by this unusual approach. The sentence ultimately turned out to be harsher than the prosecution had requested: The defendant was sentenced to 10.5 years in prison for manslaughter, while the prosecution had requested 9.5 years.
This case raises a number of questions. To what extent can and should AI be used in the justice system? What ethical boundaries must be observed? Can AI-generated representations of victims support the grieving process of relatives or potentially make it more difficult? And how does the use of such technology affect the decision-making of judges and juries? The further development and application of AI in the legal context will certainly be the subject of intense discussions.
Mindverse, a German company specializing in AI solutions, offers a wide range of applications, including chatbots, voicebots, AI search engines, and knowledge databases. In light of this case in Arizona, the question arises as to how such technologies could contribute to supporting or changing court proceedings in the future. Developments in this area remain exciting and require careful consideration of the opportunities and risks.
Sources: - t3n.de/news/ki-version-getoeteter-gericht-1686289/ - spiegel.de/netzwelt/kuenstliche-intelligenz-ki-version-eines-getoeteten-spricht-vor-gericht-a-1f42d7f8-cc77-4264-9912-09bf96067339 - finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2025-05/65343311-erstmals-hat-eine-ki-version-eines-getoeteten-vor-gericht-gesprochen-397.htm - t3n.de/tag/kuenstliche-intelligenz/ - threads.com/@t3n_magazin/post/DJY34TxKGQR/die-ki-version-eines-get%C3%B6teten-die-sich-an-den-t%C3%A4ter-richtete-kam-bei-dem-richte - facebook.com/100064654845221/posts/1118886030276548/ - t3n.de/news/ - x.com/t3n?lang=de - facebook.com/100064654845221/posts/1118828016949016/